1st Thessalonians 1:4

1st Thessalonians 1:2-7  (see also Romans 8:28; Colossians 3:12)
We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers; remembering without ceasing your work of faith and labor of love and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, before our God and Father; knowing, brethren beloved by God, His choice of you; for our gospel did not come to you in word only, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction; just as you know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake. You also became imitators of us and of the Lord, having received the word in much tribulation with the joy of the Holy Spirit, so that you became an example to all the believers in Macedonia and in Achaia.



























David Guzik comments: “Paul himself founded the church in Thessalonica on his second missionary journey (Acts 17:1-9). He was only in the city a short time because he was forced out by enemies of the gospel. But the church of the Thessalonians left behind was alive and active. Pauls deep concern for this young church he had to suddenly leave prompted this letter.” (David Guzik’s Commentaries on the Bible)

Guzik also adds: No doubt he was greatly concerned about the churches he had just founded - how were they doing? While at Corinth, Silas and Timothy came to him from Thessalonica with great news: the church there was going strong, and Paul got so excited that he dashed off this letter to the Thessalonians, probably his first letter to any church. He wrote it just a few months after he had first established the church in Thessalonica. After writing and sending this letter, Paul enjoyed a sustained and fruitful ministry in Corinth - and eventually returned to the Thessalonians.” (David Guzik’s Commentaries on the Bible)























































However, from the Calvinist perspective, this would mean that God’s choice” of them, was to bring them the Gospel in such a way, that it wasn’t in word only,” but with power,” that is, with the Holy Spirit,” accompanying full conviction,” viz. Irresistible Grace:

Calvinist, William MacDonald, comments: “The apostle was assured that these saints had been chosen by God before the foundation of the world. But how did he know? Did he have some supernatural insight? No, he knew they were among the elect by the way they had received the gospel.”  (Believer’s Bible Commentary, p.2024, emphasis mine)

But that’s exactly the problem here. Calvinists presume that there is a Calvinistically elect vs. non-class.




















Even if we granted that God was raising up Christians for a particular task, like Paul, that still doesnt demonstrate a preset, two-class society, which Calvinism requires. Paul himself had a remarkable testimony and encounter with the Lord, but even in that, Paul acknowledges his own choice in the matter, and that grace towards him was not in vain. So Calvinists often read into texts more than what is there, because their presuppositions are driving it.

John Calvin writes: “He mentions their calling, and since it had displayed exceptional marks of God’s power, he infers from it that they had been particularly called with evidence of certain election.”  (Calvin’s New Testament Commentaries: Romans and Thessalonians, p.335, emphasis mine, emphasis mine)

This is Circular Logic. He simply assumes Calvinistic election, and then insists that these are part of it.

Calvin adds: “It is to be noted, however, that the election of God, which by itself is hidden, is made known by its marks, when God gathers to Himself the lost sheep, and joins them to His flock, and stretches out His hand to those who are wandering and estranged from Him. The knowledge of our election, therefore, must be sought from this source. But just as the secret counsel of God is a labyrinth to those who disregard His calling, those who under the pretext of faith and calling obscure this first grace, from which faith itself flows, are obstinate in their error. ‘By faith,’ they say, ‘we obtain salvation. There is, therefore, no grace of God which lightens us to faith.’ It is not so, but as free elections must be connected with calling, as though with its effect, so in the meantime it must retain its primacy.” (Calvin’s New Testament Commentaries: Romans and Thessalonians, p.336, emphasis mine, emphasis mine)

Actually, Arminians absolutely do insist that there is a “grace which lightens us to faith” (i.e. Prevenient Grace), but that it is resistible, rather than being irresistible as Calvinism teaches. Giving John Calvin the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he had the Pelagians in mind, although some Calvinists such as R.C. Sproul feel that the difference between Arminianism and Pelagianism is a “distinction without a difference” since in both systems, the final choice to accept or reject God’s grace is still left up to the individual, and Sproul is certainly welcome to his perspective, but nonetheless, here you can see in Calvin’s quote, that there is a very real distinction between Arminianism and Pelagianism, as Arminians insist that God’s enabling grace is absolutely essential, rather than being altogether absent.

In terms of MacDonalds comment, Calvinists suppose that there is such a thing as an elect unbeliever, which is absolutely absurd because according to Romans 9:33, the elect are free from condemnation, while according to John 3:18, unbelievers are enslaved to condemnation. Therefore, you cannot have an elect [redeemed] unbeliever [condemned]. Calvinists have set up an impossible situation, and yet they insist upon it anyway, as MacDonald further points out: “We do not know who the elect are, and so we should carry the gospel to all the world.” (Believer’s Bible Commentary, p.2024, emphasis mine) However, I can tell you who the elect are. They are Christians, that is, the redeemed in Christ. (Romans 8:1, 33) Colossians 3:12-13 states: “So, as those who have been chosen of God, holy and beloved, put on a heart of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience; bearing with one another, and forgiving each other, whoever has a complaint against anyone; just as the Lord forgave you, so also should you.” Now, seriously, how could that, in any way, apply to an unbeliever? That’s why I believe that it is evident that the elect, in New Testament terms (in contrast to the elect Jews of the Old Testament), are Christians...not unbelievers predestined to salvation, but Christians.

Question:  Gods choice of them was for what? Salvation or service?

Answer:  To serve in Pauls absence. Paul reflects on how God saved them, as evidence that God was using them. Recall that Paul was chased out of many of the areas in which he planted churches, and here is an example, and he wept over them, praying that the Lord would sustain these churches, and what happened is that God raised up Christians, that is, the brethren beloved by God, to stand in his place, and in this letter, he writes to them.
From a contextual standpoint, it seems that Pauls focus was on what the brethren, beloved by God, were doing in his absence, in sustaining the church-plant that he had been forced to leave behind, and I think that Pauls words at 1:4 were intended to be an encouragement in their election to sustain this church-plant, by recalling to them how  God had so miraculously brought them the Gospel.

Paraphrase:We give thanks to God always for all of you, making mention of you in our prayers; constantly bearing in mind your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ in the presence of our God and Father, knowing, brethren beloved by God, His choice of you [to continue in this thing that you are doing, i.e. your ‘work of faith,’ your ‘labor of love,’ in ‘steadfastness of hope,’ in sustaining this church-plant, of which I cannot do myself, since I was driven out, and which has not gone unnoticed by God the Father]; for our gospel did not come to you in word only, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction.” [i.e. there is a reason why God has called you into His grace, and it is for this very purpose, that you complete the task that is set before you, of which you have already been so faithful.]
Question:  Does the text state, “God chose you because you believed”?

Answer:  Regardless, the text does not state what God chose them for. It states, “knowing brethren beloved by God, His choice of you,” leaving the door open for the question of what His choice of them was for. Was it a choice of sinners to salvation, or of believers to service? I argue for the latter since it was a choice of “brethren beloved by God.” It’s like highlighting God’s choice of someone to be a Pastor. Yes, although Paul follows this thought by detailing the miraculous nature of God’s instrumental intervention in their conversation, in my mind, this is to reinforce the fact that God has been the driving force behind the formation of the Thessalonian Church from day 1, and that if God was so interested in building the church, He would likely be no less interested in sustaining it, and of course Paul praises them for their work in doing so.
Question:  Why would Paul give thanks “to God” for the salvation of the Thessalonians if it was by their own free-will that they believed and were saved?

Answer:  We don’t thank the Thessalonians for saving themselves, since if left to themselves, they would have perished. The Thessalonians had a rescuer, and just as you would thank a rescuer for pulling a shark-victim out of the water, you would similarly thank a heavenly rescuer for pulling a sin-victim out of a state of doom and depravity.
Question:  Is Paul stating that there is a special elect class which is predetermined, limited and differentiated from a non-elect class?

Answer:  No. But Calvinists will insist that such a concept is taught elsewhere, and that these must be part of that class. But thats Circular Logic. If Calvinists wish to assert that this passage teaches Unconditional Election, and if Unconditional Election is inextricably tied to the concept of a preset, two-class society of the elect vs. non-elect, and if this passage isnt teaching such a fixed, two-class society of elect vs. non-elect, then this passage cannot be used to prove Unconditional Election.