The cities of the Negev have been locked up, and there is no one to open them; all Judah has been carried into exile, wholly carried into exile. Lift up your eyes and see those coming from the north. Where is the flock that was given you, your beautiful sheep? What will you say when He appoints over you--and you yourself had taught them--former companions to be head over you? Will not pangs take hold of you like a woman in childbirth? If you say in your heart, “Why have these things happened to me?” Because of the magnitude of your iniquity your skirts have been removed and your heels have been exposed. Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots? Then you also can do good who are accustomed to doing evil. Therefore I will scatter them like drifting straw to the desert wind. “This is your lot, the portion measured to you from Me,” declares the LORD, “Because you have forgotten Me and trusted in falsehood.”
Concerning the spots, at Jeremiah 13:23, God echoes what Israel itself confesses at Jeremiah 18:11-13:
God is saying that those spots shouldn’t be, and that it is to their shame.
Calvinist, James White, writes: “Those who are accustomed to doing evil can no more simply decide to do good than a leopard can simply ‘choose’ to change its spots. Why? Because a leopard’s spots are part of its nature, and sinners, fallen sons and daughters of Adam, likewise share his corrupted nature. The nature must be changed before true good can be done.” (Debating Calvinism, pp.66-67, emphasis mine)
These were God’s people. They should not have been “accustomed to doing evil.” Nevertheless, what kind of change of nature is White proposing?
Calvinist, James White, writes: “Just as a person cannot change the color of their skin, or the leopard its spots, so the one who practices evil cannot break the bondage of sin and start doing good. The corruption is indelible and can only be removed by a radical change of the heart.” (The Potter’s Freedom, p.80, emphasis mine)
The “radical change of the heart” is simply a Calvinist’s coded-language for Irresistible Grace, and yet, if that’s true, then why did God make the solution to their recovery, the Babylonian captivity? Surely, He could have simply, instead, dispensed an alleged, Irresistible Grace, as suggested by White? Of course, the Calvinist will simply utilize the ever convenient escape-hatch of, “well, this is just the means by which God instills the radical change (i.e. Irresistible Grace)....” The bottom line is that White is guilty of proof-texting, since literally, nowhere in the context, is it teaching an Irresistible Grace.