“Have you not heard? Long ago I did it; From ancient times I planned it. Now I have brought it to pass, that you should turn fortified cities into ruinous heaps.”
So King Hezekiah of Judah sent a message to prophet Isaiah, who returned with this response: “‘Say to your master, “This is what the LORD says: Do not be disturbed by this blasphemous speech against me from the Assyrian king’s messengers. Listen! I myself will move against him, and the king will receive a report from Assyria telling him that he is needed at home. Then I will make him want to return to his land, where I will have him killed with a sword.”’” (2nd Kings 19:6-7, TLB)
King Sennacherib returned with this message: “‘This message is for King Hezekiah of Judah. Don’t let this God you trust deceive you with promises that Jerusalem will not be captured by the king of Assyria. You know perfectly well what the kings of Assyria have done wherever they have gone. They have crushed everyone who stood in their way! Why should you be any different? Have the gods of other nations rescued them—such nations as Gozan, Haran, Rezeph, and the people of Eden who were in Tel-assar? The former kings of Assyria destroyed them all! What happened to the king of Hamath and the king of Arpad? What happened to the kings of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah?’” (2nd Kings 19:10-13, TLB)
“‘But I know you well—your comings and goings and all you do. I know the way you have raged against me. And because of your arrogance against me, which I have heard for myself, I will put my hook in your nose and my bridle in your mouth. I will make you return by the road on which you came.’” (2nd Kings 19:27-28, TLB)
Calvinist, William MacDonald, writes: “Sennacherib also boasted of other foreign conquests, including his victory over Egypt. What he didn’t realize was that all he had one was what God had already determined to be done. God knew him inside and out and would break his towering arrogance, sending back to Assyria the remnants of his shattered army.” (Believer’s Bible Commentary, p.414, emphasis mine)
Calvinist, Erwin Lutzer, explains: “Thus, to harden a man’s heart, God may have to do no more than simply to abandon him to his own desires and lusts.” (The Doctrines That Divide, p.173)
I agree, and that is a passive role. For instance, Genesis 50:20 records concerning Joseph and his brothers: “‘As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive.’”
God did not take an active role in the sin of Joseph’s brothers, no more than God took an active role in the sin of King Sennacherib. Joseph’s brothers took an active role in their own sin, while God was passive, merely hardening them to the extent that God permitted them to exercise their own free-will. God’s active role was in undoing their evil deed, in order to turn it around for good. In the same way, God used what King Sennacherib meant for evil, and used it to achieve good. Again, the point is that permission is a passive role. However, if God had collaborated with King Sennacherib in order to sin, then it would inevitably follow that God had not only taken an active role, but also became the Tempter, and yet the Bible clarifies the opposite: “Let no one say when he is tempted, ‘I am being tempted by God’; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone.” (James 1:13) Arminians do not wish to consider God’s passive role to be described as “ordaining” for the simple reason that it casts an appearance of taking on an active role, when yet it is passive.
From an Arminian standpoint, if sin is born in the heart and mind of someone else, and God foreknows it, then God may use it, through passive & active roles, that is, passively hardening the evil-doer while actively working the righteous angle, without being stained by guilt of sin. But if sin was born in the heart and mind of God, and God thus decreed, ordained, caused, authored and scripted a world full of iniquity, in order to achieve His own glory, then the passive & active distinctions become blurred beyond the point of being able to sufficiently mitigate against the “Author of Sin” charge.