But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light.
1st Peter 2:9 alludes to Deuteronomy 14:2, which states concerning Israel: “For you are a holy people to the LORD your God, and the LORD has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.” The Jews are indeed the chosen people: “Now the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go forth from your country, And from your relatives And from your father’s house, To the land which I will show you; And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.’ And I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.” (Genesis 12:1-3)
Mac Brunson comments: “When you were born physically of your mom and dad, you reflect their race physically, but let me tell you something spiritually. You’ve been born again from the seed which is above. You are no longer white, black, or yellow. You are part of the elect race.” (The Flip Side of Hurt: The Hope for our Loneliness and Isolation; 1 Peter 2:4-10, emphasis mine)
New birth is the entrance into that elect race. Do unbelievers have any part of the elect race? No. There is no such animal as an elect unbeliever, at least by New Testament standards. The Jews, of course, are designated as God’s chosen people, as those who are elect in Abraham. The point here, though, is to show that there is a greater election, that you can be part of, but you must be spiritually born into it.
John Calvin comments: “He calls them an elect race, because God, passing by others, adopted them as it were in a special manner. They were also a holy nation, for God had consecrated them to Himself, and destined that they should lead a pure and holy life; and a people for God’s own possession, that they might be to Him a peculiar possession or inheritance. I take the words simply in this sense, that the Lord has called us, in order to possess us as His own people, devoted to Him. This meaning is proved by the words of Moses, ‘If ye keep my covenant, ye shall be to me a peculiar treasure beyond all other nations’ (Exod. 19:5).” (Calvin’s New Testament Commentaries: Hebrews and I and II Peter, pp.256-266, emphasis mine)
See, that’s the point. John Calvin is pulling things out of thin air. Nowhere, and I repeat, nowhere, does 1st Peter 2:9 say anything about the Calvinist formula that John Calvin just described. Ultimately, you have a discussion on Election with no mention whatsoever of anything Calvinistic, and John Calvin just assumes it, and demands that that’s what it must mean. That’s Assumology (or eisegesis). That’s just importing a given theology into a text without any justification.
John Hagee states: “Jesus called a Gentile woman, a dog. He never called the Gentiles His brethren. Let me remind you of something. We did not get plugged in until the cross. We had no basis of standing with God until the cross. There’s where we were in Galatians 3 when Paul said you were outside the covenance of Israel, without hope and without God. That’s very important. Then at the cross, we were plugged in, and we received the riches of Abraham, and we received healing, and we received adoption, and we received all the cornucopia of the blessings of God. But before the cross, we were castoffs. You need to understand that.” (emphasis mine)
Calvin writes: “In the matter of these benefits, there is a contrast between us and the rest of mankind to be considered, from which it is clear how incomparable is God’s goodness towards us, because He sanctified us, who are by nature polluted. He has chosen us, whom He could find nothing in us but evil and vileness; He makes us His peculiar possession from being worthless dregs; He confers the honour of priesthood on the profane; He brings the vassals of Satan, of sin, and of death, to royal liberty.” (Calvin’s New Testament Commentaries: Hebrews and I and II Peter, p.266, emphasis mine)
God does not “confer the honour of priesthood on the profane,” but upon the redeemed in Christ. (Romans 8:1) The reason why Calvin explains it as he does, is so that he can avoid admitting that God bestows eternal life to believers, so that he can instead spin it to mean that God bestows eternal life upon elect unbelievers, who, as “worthless dregs,” “profane” and “vassals of Satan,” believe through Irresistible Grace. As always, the controversy boils down to the Arminian Election in Christ vs. Calvinist Election in the Father.